Ulf Ramberg
Senior lecturer
Tracing divergence in crisis governance : responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in France, Germany and Sweden compared
Author
Summary, in English
This cross-country comparison of administrative responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in France, Germany and Sweden is aimed at exploring how institutional contexts and administrative cultures have shaped strategies of problem-solving and governance modes during the pandemic, and to what extent the crisis has been used for opportunity management. The article shows that in France, the central government reacted determinedly and hierarchically, with tough containment measures. By contrast, the response in Germany was characterized by an initial bottom-up approach that gave way to remarkable federal unity in the further course of the crisis, followed again by a return to regional variance and local discretion. In Sweden, there was a continuation of ‘normal governance’ and a strategy of relying on voluntary compliance largely based on recommendations and less – as in Germany and France – on a strategy of imposing legally binding regulations. The comparative analysis also reveals that relevant stakeholders in all three countries have used the crisis as an opportunity for changes in the institutional settings and administrative procedures.
Department/s
- Strategy
Publishing year
2021-01-06
Language
English
Pages
556-575
Publication/Series
International Review of Administrative Sciences
Volume
87
Issue
3
Document type
Journal article
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Topic
- Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
- Public Administration Studies
Keywords
- administrative culture, containment, crisis, governance, multi-level system, policy advice, public health, window of opportunity
Status
Published
Project
- Public Management Research
ISBN/ISSN/Other
- ISSN: 1461-7226