The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Maria Stanfors. Photo.

Maria Stanfors

Professor

Maria Stanfors. Photo.

Heterogamy and contraceptive use among married and cohabiting women

Author

  • Maria Stanfors
  • Josephine Jacobs

Summary, in English

Decisions about which contraceptives to use are a key component of a couple’s “fertility work,” and these decisions can be made in homogamous or heterogamous couple contexts. Relative resource theory and the strain perspective suggest that heterogamy may lead to differences in bargaining power or higher levels of discordance within couples, thereby affecting the distribution of fertility work and decisions about which contraceptives a couple will use. While heterogamy has been linked to less effective contraceptive use amongst teenagers, its role in the contraceptive behavior of married and cohabiting women has been less widely studied. This study examines the association between relationship context in terms of education, age, and race/ethnicity heterogamy and partnered women’s use of contraceptives. We used data on partnered women aged 20-45 who were trying to avoid pregnancy from the 2006-2015 National Survey of Family Growth (n= 8,097). We used multinomial logistic regressions to determine whether education, age, or race/ethnicity heterogamy was associated with the use of male or female sterilization, long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), other hormonal contraceptives, or other non-hormonal methods. We did not find consistent evidence that relative bargaining power due to higher education, more advanced age, or racial/ethnic privilege resulted in the use of methods requiring lower levels of fertility work. We found some evidence supporting the strain perspective. Younger women (20-34) who differed from their partners along two or more dimensions were less likely to use contraceptive methods requiring ongoing effort and coordination (i.e., LARCs, other hormonal methods, and non-hormonal methods). This association was not observed among women aged 35-45. Despite the more permanent nature of marriage/cohabitation, differences between partners in heterogamous relationships may factor into the contraceptive decision-making process, especially among younger adults at earlier stages of their relationships.

Department/s

  • Department of Economic History
  • Centre for Economic Demography

Publishing year

2022-06

Language

English

Publication/Series

Advances in Life Course Research

Volume

53

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Economic History

Keywords

  • heterogamy
  • contraception
  • marriage/cohabitation
  • United States
  • National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG)
  • multinomial logistic regression

Status

Published

Project

  • Educational assortative mating and inequality. Consequences of changing family dynamics in Sweden, 1970-2020

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1569-4909