The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

 Roel van Veldhuizen . Photo

Roel van Veldhuizen

Senior lecturer

 Roel van Veldhuizen . Photo

Subjective Judgment and Gender Bias in Advice: Evidence from the Laboratory

Author

  • Juliana Silva Goncalves
  • Roel van Veldhuizen

Summary, in English

Better understanding and reducing gender gaps in the labor market remains an important policy goal. We study the role of advice in sustaining these gender gaps using a laboratory experiment. In the experiment, “advisers” advise “workers” to choose between a more ambitious and a less ambitious task based on the worker’s subjective self-assessment. We expected female workers to be less confident and advisers to hold gender stereotypes, leading to a gender bias in advice. However, we find no evidence that women are less confident or that advice is gender-biased. Our results contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms driving gender differences in the labor market. They also call for caution when making general interpretations of research findings pointing to a gender bias in specific settings.

Department/s

  • Department of Economics

Publishing year

2020-12-14

Language

English

Publication/Series

Working Papers

Issue

2020:27

Document type

Working paper

Topic

  • Economics

Keywords

  • advice
  • subjective judgment
  • gender bias
  • C91
  • D91
  • J16

Status

Published