The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

 Pol Campos . Photo

Pol Campos

Senior lecturer

 Pol Campos . Photo

When are groups less moral than individuals?

Author

  • Pol Campos-Mercade

Summary, in English

Individuals are less likely to make morally desirable decisions when they are in groups. I study when this phenomenon makes groups less likely to produce a morally desirable outcome than one individual alone. I formulate and test a model in which a moral outcome occurs if at least one individual makes a costly decision. Using a lab experiment and data from field experiments on the bystander effect, I show that if most individuals are moral, the moral outcome is more likely to be produced by one individual, whereas if most individuals are immoral, it is more likely to be produced by a group. This rule is not only useful for reconciling previous mixed evidence on moral decision-making in groups, but may also be applied to better design organizations and institutions.

Department/s

  • Department of Economics

Publishing year

2022-07

Language

English

Pages

20-36

Publication/Series

Games and Economic Behavior

Volume

134

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

0899-8256

Topic

  • Ethics
  • Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified

Keywords

  • Bystander effect
  • Group size
  • Moral behavior
  • Social preferences

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0899-8256