The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Hossein Asgharian. Photo.

Hossein Asgharian

Professor

Hossein Asgharian. Photo.

Systemic Risk and Centrality Revisited: The Role of Interactions

Author

  • Hossein Asgharian
  • Dominika Krygier
  • Anders Wilhelmsson

Summary, in English

We suggest that banks contribute extensively to systemic risk only if they are both "risky" and centrally placed in the financial network. To calculate systemic risk we apply the CoVaR measure of Adrian and Brunnermeier (2016) and measure centrality using detailed US loan syndication data. In agreement with our conjecture our main finding is that centrality is an important determinant of systemic risk but primarily not by its direct effect. Rather, its main influence is to make other firm specific risk measures more important for highly connected banks. A bank's contribution to systemic risk from a fixed level of Value-at-Risk is about four times higher for a bank with two standard deviations above average centrality compared to a bank with average network centrality. Neglecting this indirect moderation effect of centrality severely underestimates the importance of centrality for "risky" banks and overestimates the effect for "safer" banks.

Department/s

  • Department of Economics

Publishing year

2019

Language

English

Publication/Series

Working Papers

Issue

2019:4

Document type

Working paper

Topic

  • Economics

Keywords

  • systemic risk
  • network centrality
  • loan syndication
  • CoVaR
  • G18
  • G21

Status

Published