The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Fredrik NG Andersson. Photo.

Fredrik N G Andersson

Associate professor

Fredrik NG Andersson. Photo.

Frivillig anpassning eller tvingande restriktioner? : Överdödligheten, pandemibekämpningen och den ekonomiska utvecklingen i Europa under 2020

Author

  • Fredrik N G Andersson

Summary, in Swedish

To reduce the spread of the Covid19 virus, governments have imposed far reaching restrictions on citizens’ mobility. These restrictions are associated with large social, economic, and democratic costs. In this article, I discuss whether it is possible to limit the economic costs by relying more on voluntary than mandated social distancing without causing the excess death rate to increase significantly. Based on data from Europe during 2020, I show that i) voluntary social distancing is higher in places with large infection rates, ii) the marginal benefit of additional restrictions on the excess death rate is small, and iii) the economic cost increases rapidly with additional restrictions. I conclude that the importance of voluntary social distancing should not be underestimated. More voluntary than mandatory social distancing may reduce the economic costs without increasing the excess death rate.

Department/s

  • Department of Economics

Publishing year

2022-06-23

Language

Swedish

Pages

463-491

Publication/Series

Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift

Volume

2

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Fahlbeckska stiftelsen

Topic

  • Economics

Keywords

  • corona
  • COVID19
  • överdödlighet
  • ekonomisk kris
  • ekonomi

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0039-0747