The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Portrait of Anders Anell. Photo.

Anders Anell

Professor

Portrait of Anders Anell. Photo.

Leadership and governance in seven developed health systems

Author

  • Peter C. Smith
  • Anders Anell
  • Reinhard Busse
  • Luca Crivelli
  • Judith Healy
  • Anne Karin Lindahl
  • Gert Westert
  • Tobechukwu Kene

Summary, in English

This paper explores leadership and governance arrangements in seven developed health systems: Australia, England, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and Switzerland. It presents a cybernetic model of leadership and governance comprising three fundamental functions: priority setting, performance monitoring and accountability arrangements. The paper uses a structured survey to examine critically current arrangements in the seven countries. Approaches to leadership and governance vary substantially, and have to date been developed piecemeal and somewhat arbitrarily. Although there seems to be reasonable consensus on broad goals of the health system there is variation in approaches to setting priorities. Cost-effectiveness analysis is in widespread use as a basis for operational priority setting, but rarely plays a central role. Performance monitoring may be the domain where there is most convergence of thinking, although countries are at different stages of development. The third domain of accountability is where the greatest variation occurs, and where there is greatest uncertainty about the optimal approach. We conclude that a judicious mix of accountability mechanisms is likely to be appropriate in most settings, including market mechanisms, electoral processes, direct financial incentives, and professional oversight and control. The mechanisms should be aligned with the priority setting and monitoring processes. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Department/s

  • Institute of Economic Research

Publishing year

2012

Language

English

Pages

37-49

Publication/Series

Health Policy

Volume

106

Issue

1

Document type

Journal article review

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Economics and Business

Keywords

  • Leadership
  • Governance
  • Health systems
  • Accountability

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1872-6054