Quality assurance in research education
The doctoral programmes at LUSEM are regularly evaluated and developed so that the quality of the programmes can be maintained. Peer review is a crucial part of this quality assurance process, and an external peer review committee is appointed for every evaluation.
The quality assurance process
The process starts with a self-evaluation made by the department responsible for the doctoral programme. This self-evaluation is summarized in a self-assessment report. The doctoral student union gets the opportunity to submit a special report to the peer-review committee. Based on the self-assessment report, the doctoral student union’s report, and interviews with representatives from the department management, supervisors and doctoral students, the task of the peer-review committee is to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the programme and make recommendations.
More information can be found in the document below.
- Guidelines for quality assurance of research education at LUSEM
(pdf, in Swedish)
Quality assurance evaluations at LUSEM
Evaluation of the PhD programme in Research Policy 2022
- Report from the external evaluation group (pdf)
- EDR’s comment (pdf)
- The department’s response to the evaluation (pdf)
- LUSEM’s response to the evaluation (pdf)
Evaluation of the PhD programme in Business Administration 2021/22
- Report from the external evaluation group (pdf)
- EDR’s comment (pdf)
- The department's response to the evaluation (pdf)
- LUSEM’s response to the evaluation (pdf)
Evaluation of the PhD programme in Business Law 2020
- Report from the external evaluation group (pdf)
- The department’s response to the evaluation (pdf)
- LUSEM’s response to the evaluation (pdf)
Evaluation of the PhD programme in Informatics 2020
- Report from the external evaluation group (pdf)
- The department’s response to the evaluation (pdf)
- LUSEM’s response to the evaluation (pdf)
Evaluation of the PhD programme in Statistics 2020
- Report from the external evaluation group (pdf)
- The department’s response to the evaluation (pdf)
- LUSEM’s response to the evaluation 210216 (pdf)
- LUSEM’s response to the evaluation 210419 (pdf)