The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

 Roel van Veldhuizen . Photo

Roel van Veldhuizen

Senior lecturer

 Roel van Veldhuizen . Photo

Anchoring and subjective belief distributions

Author

  • Håkan J. Holm
  • Margaret Samahita
  • Roel van Veldhuizen
  • Erik Wengström

Summary, in English

We investigate how the anchoring effect—a well-established cognitive bias—influences subjective belief distributions. While prior research extensively examines the impact of anchoring and other biases on point estimates, their effect on the underlying distribution and its higher moments remains unexplored. Using two pre-registered online experiments (N = 1467) and two elicitation methods, we find that anchoring impacts not just the mean, but also higher moments of belief distributions. Notably, the traditional anchoring effect in means diminishes when eliciting distributions rather than point estimates. We also find that the elicitation method matters: inattentive participants generate spiky distributions when manually entering numbers for many bins, whereas they generate flat distributions using a click-and-drag interface. These findings show that cognitive biases can extend beyond point estimates, and that the elicitation technique may impact results especially among inattentive participants.

Department/s

  • Department of Economics

Publishing year

2025-12

Language

English

Publication/Series

Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

Volume

240

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Economics

Keywords

  • Anchoring
  • Belief elicitation
  • Heuristics and biases
  • D73
  • C91
  • K42

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0167-2681