The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

 Roel van Veldhuizen . Photo

Roel van Veldhuizen

Senior lecturer

 Roel van Veldhuizen . Photo

Moral Motive Selection in the Lying-Dictator Game

Author

  • Kai Barron
  • Robert Stüber
  • Roel van Veldhuizen

Summary, in English

An extensive literature documents that people are willing to sacrifice personal material gain to adhere to a moral motive. Yet, less is known about what happens when moral motives are in conflict. We hypothesize that individuals engage in what we term “motive selection,” namely adhering to the moral motive that aligns with their self-interest. We test this hypothesis using a laboratory experiment that induces a conflict between two of the most-studied moral motives: fairness and truth-telling. In line with our hypothesis, our results show that individuals prefer to adhere to the moral motive that is more aligned with their self-interest.

Department/s

  • Department of Economics

Publishing year

2022

Language

English

Publication/Series

Working Papers

Issue

2022:16

Document type

Working paper

Topic

  • Economics

Keywords

  • Motivated reasoning
  • dictator game
  • lying game
  • motives
  • moral dilemmas
  • C91
  • D01
  • D63
  • D90

Status

Published