The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Eva Ranehill. Photo.

Eva Ranehill

Professor

Eva Ranehill. Photo.

Gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution

Author

  • Eva Ranehill
  • Roberto A. Weber

Summary, in English

There is substantial evidence that women tend to support different policies and political candidates than men. Many studies also document gender differences in a variety of important preference dimensions, such as risk-taking, competition and pro-sociality. However, the degree to which differential voting by men and women is related to these gaps in more basic preferences requires an improved understanding. We conduct an experiment in which individuals in small laboratory “societies” repeatedly vote for redistribution policies and engage in production. We find that women vote for more egalitarian redistribution and that this difference persists with experience and in environments with varying degrees of risk. This gender voting gap is accounted for partly by both gender gaps in preferences and by expectations regarding economic circumstances. However, including both these controls in a regression analysis indicates that the latter is the primary driving force. We also observe policy differences between male- and female-controlled groups, though these are substantially smaller than the mean individual differences—a natural consequence of the aggregation of individual preferences into collective outcomes.

Department/s

  • Department of Economics

Publishing year

2022

Language

English

Pages

845-875

Publication/Series

Experimental Economics

Volume

25

Issue

3

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Springer

Topic

  • Economics

Keywords

  • Altruism
  • Experiment
  • Gender differences
  • Redistributive preferences
  • Risk

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1386-4157