The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Eva Ranehill. Photo.

Eva Ranehill

Professor

Eva Ranehill. Photo.

Gender, risk preferences and willingness to compete in a random sample of the Swedish population

Author

  • Anne Boschini
  • Anna Dreber
  • Emma von Essen
  • Astri Muren
  • Eva Ranehill

Summary, in English

Experimental results from student and other non-representative convenience samples often suggest that men, on average, are more risk taking and competitive than women. We explore whether these gender preference gaps also exist in incentivized tasks in a simple random sample of the Swedish adult population. Our design comprises four different conditions to systematically explore how the experimental context may impact gender gaps; a baseline condition, a condition where participants are primed with their own gender, and two conditions where the participants know the gender of their counterpart (man or woman). We further look at competitiveness in two domains: a math task and a verbal task. We find no gender gap in risk taking or competitiveness in the verbal task in this random sample. There is some support for men being more competitive than women in the math task in the pooled sample, but the effect size is small. We further find no consistent impact of the respective conditions on (the absence of) the gender gap in preferences.

Publishing year

2019-12-01

Language

English

Publication/Series

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics

Volume

83

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Gender Studies
  • Economics

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 2214-8043