The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Emelie Rohne Till. Photo

Emelie Rohne Till

Researcher

Emelie Rohne Till. Photo

Transformation and resilience in times of change: A historical perspective

Author

  • Emelie Rohne Till
  • Sylvia Schwaag Serger
  • Tobias Axelsson
  • Martin Andersson

Summary, in English

Our current historical moment is marked by a widespread sense of (ongoing and anticipated) crises, prompting calls to change existing economic, political, social, and environmental systems. This discourse has directed increased scholarly and policy-orientated attention to the concepts of “transformation” and “resilience.” However, beyond attention, these concepts have increasingly adopted a place in rationales for policy action and measurements of its success, highlighting the need for conceptual clarity. In light of this, this paper reviews the use of transformation and resilience in the literature. These concepts appear across a broad spectrum of research fields, ranging from the natural to the social sciences. However, definitions and contexts vary broadly, further underlining the need for clarity. In this paper, we delve specifically into two disciplines: science, technology, and innovation (STI) policy research and economic history. Although unified in their explicit concern with societal change, the disciplines' different understandings of such change, particularly temporal aspects, offer fertile ground for exploring the divergent understandings, uses, and definitions of transformation and resilience in the literature. Through this work, the paper makes two main contributions. First, it produces a nuanced review of how the literature employs the concepts of transformation and resilience. Second, it offers an analysis of how transformation and resilience can be understood in relation to each other from a historical perspective. By historically anchoring these concepts while acknowledging that every time is different, the paper also offers some policy guidance on a key challenge of our era: how to successfully govern resilience and transformation in times of change.

Department/s

  • Department of Economic History
  • Economic development of the Global South
  • LU Profile Area: Human rights
  • CIRCLE

Publishing year

2024-09

Language

English

Publication/Series

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volume

206

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Economic History

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0040-1625