The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Science meets art in DigiJustice finale

Photo montage: a woman knits threads coming out of a computer.
Photo: Hanna Barakat & Cambridge Diversity Fund.

The Pufendorf theme “DigiJustice: Rethinking Digital Inequalities and Human Rights in the Age of AI” has wrapped up with a conference and exhibition.

The interdisciplinary group has shifted its focus throughout the year-long theme. What began as discussions on AI's part in amplifying digital inequality became a practical exploration into how this is happening. On 15 May 2025, the group invited friends and colleagues to delve into the results of the theme's work. Combining science and art, the day aimed to challenge the current view on AI and digitalisation in society by making room for a broader range of viewpoints. 

Perspectives on AI and inequality

After a welcoming and introduction by Miranda Kajtazi, the conference started with a critical talk between Lena Halldenius and Osama Mansour, referencing the conversations the group have had and developed during the past year. 

AI is causing so much harm without knowing who is doing the harm.

– Osama Mansour, Associate professor in Information Systems & Lena Halldenius, Professor in Human Rights Studies

The audience got to hear a keynote speech held by guest Susie Alegre, followed by a curated panel discussion led by Sue Anne Teo and Petra Gyongyi, hosting presentations by guests Jakob Stenseke, Michael Strange and visiting fellows Becky Faith and Victoria Adelmant. 

Six people standing and sitting in a row, laughing.
Q&A session. Photo: Miranda Kajtazi.

The presentations displayed several themes, angles and opinions on the use of AI in different parts of society – politics, law, welfare, and more – and potential effects on humans and human relationships. A final Q&A gave the audience a chance to pitch in with their own thoughts.

What is lost? // What is found?

The exhibition was curated and edited by theme members Moa Petersén, Mia Liinason and Karen Louise Grova Søilen, together with collaborating artist and researcher Robert Willim. The artworks Ambient Assets, Robot triptych, Virtual courts, What is lost? // What is found? and Pufendorf chatbot uses different mediums to playfully show AI in different societal contexts. 

A person taking a photograph of a robot torso while standing partly in front of a TV displaying a presentation with the text "The world's FIRST robot vacuum cleaner child"
Robot triptych. Photo: Oleksandra Panasenko

As described in the accompanying booklet: 

“Organised around five composite artworks, What is lost? // What is found? evokes and questions imaginaries that allow spectators to explore the various limits and possibilities of digital solutions in different sites, such as the home, the courtroom, the marketplace, history, and culture, encouraging a curious and critical approach to reflecting on current and future human relations in society.” 

A collage of two photos of two red neon signs. One reads "What is lost?" the other reads "What is found?".
What is lost? // What is found? Photo: Oleksandra Panasenko
A person viewing a wall-hung piece of art, and a person reading a booklet, from behind.
Virtual courts. Photo: Oleksandra Panasenko.

What's in the future for DigiJustice?

The DigiJustice group envisions bringing the exhibition to new audiences by hosting additional showings in other contexts across Lunds University. They are also exploring the possibility of preserving the exhibition digitally, allowing it to live on as a permanent resource. 

In parallel, participants have submitted proposals to several funding agencies in smaller constellations. They are also planning on submitting for an ERC advanced grant, which could potentially fund all members to participate in a continued project for up to five years, further developing the conversations and research within digital justice and AI.